Kameron Hurley of Brutal Women stands up for her male friends who live feminism.
Janice Earlbaum sketches out some stereotypical non-feminist men who call themselves feminists.
Hugo also chimes in on the subject, at the request of Loaded-Question Guy.
Kameron is actually (in part) reacting to Janice's post, and it's interesting to read the comments in Janice's post. She has apparently nailed some of the stereotypes, as people are chiming in with variations of "Right on!" in the comments. And I have no doubt that these are common stereotypes, and that there are enough men who fit 'em to account for the chiming in.
And I see myself in some of them, unfortunately. In fact, to somebody who doesn't know me well (or perhaps to those who do?), I could be immediately placed in any of those categories at the outset. And yet, I don't consider myself a misogynist (at least, to the degree that I'm able to overcome my training toward misogyny from being part of this culture). What gives?
Well, apparently, a tell-tale sign of being the kind of anit-feminist-feminist man is shouting from the rooftops (to whatever degree) that you are a feminist. The key to picking out the fake feminist men, according to Janice, is to take those who proclaim being feminists with a grain of salt:
As a matter of fact, it's caused me to realize that most of the men I've personally known who have made a huge hairy point of identifying as feminists have been either date rapists, mom fetishists, porn addicts, or bear daddies inflicting their frustrated pseudopaternal tendencies on women. They are some of the most passive-aggressive, patronizing, out-dishing without it-taking twerps on the planet, and they are poisoning the women's movement from the inside by sapping the hell out of everyone's goddamn energy.
I think I see her point. It's a pretty straightforward Freudian/Shakespearian thing, isn't it, for a misogynist to proclaim himself a feminist, and loudly. Something along the lines of 'methings thou dost prostest too much' or something.
And yet.
I think it's important for men who identify as feminists to shout it from the rooftops. To make a big, hairy deal about it. And here's why: It's too easy to keep one's feminism to oneself, as a man. It's too much in line with the traditional masculinities that I think screw men (and other genders) over: Men are strong and silent. They show by deed, not by word. They're not too bright, so they should keep sorta quiet (and that makes them somehow more manly). They should just do feminism, not talk about their identities as feminists.
So: How do you spot the fake male feminists? Well, they're the ones shouting it from the rooftops that they are feminists. You can spot the real feminists by watching what they do.
That doesn't make enough sense to me. And this is why: You spot the 'real' male feminists both by word and deed. They are the ones who are shouting it from the rooftops, making it a big, hairy (love that it's a 'hairy' deal--another traditionally masculine trait) deal about it; and then, they're backing it up. The ones who make a big deal about it and don't back it up? They're fake, yep. The ones who don't make a big deal about it--maybe they're doing feminism in their own way, but to my mind that's not the only way to do feminism; and, to the extent that that way just buys into traditional masculinity (the strong, silent type), it's actually not helping as much as shouting it, and then doing it.
Update: Lindsay of Majikthise says a lot of what I've tried to say much more eloquently, and from a different perspective:
It takes a lot of courage for a guy to self-identify as a feminist outside his women's studies class. A man who's willing to tell his drinking buddies that he's a feminist is taking a risk. He's putting a little of his privilege on the line when it counts. That's a choice that commands respect.
Some feminists argue that men don't deserve "extra credit" for doing the right thing. I don't consider it extra credit to acknowledge the distinctive obstacles that men in our society have to overcome in order to get right with feminism.
Any guy who's willing to stand up and be counted as a feminist deserves to march under our banner.
9 comments:
Here's a way to tell: men who make a big deal of their "feminist-ness" only in female company are deeply suspect. Men who are genuine will speak out about it the loudest in front of other men, that's the key difference betwwen fakers and genuine guys.
free--
While I think I agree with you for the most part, I hope to address what I see as the not-simple problem of (pro-)feminist men interacting with non-feminist men (and non-feminist women!). I think that, sometimes, 'asserting oneself' as a feminist in a group of non-feminist-ish men could be the sort of metaphorical pissing contest that frames a lot of the interactions of men who differ in opinion. That's the sort of speaking out loudest in front of other men that I might want to avoid.
On the other hand, not outing oneself in the way you note certainly seems like a good sign of insincerity.
adrienne--
Thanks for the support!
hello again. I more or less agree I think but need to clarify a bit from my initial post. What I meant by speaking out in front of other men was not the need to make the declaration: "look at me I'm a feminist" , but rather stuff like calling other guys out on their misogynistic or sexist crap.
Example: the fakers are all pretend-supportive in front of their women friends, but then with their men-buddies they'll join in laugh at the sexist jokes, or just as bad - stay silent.
For most(?) men their biggest insecurity is rejection by other men. Being prepared to stand up to that, by both word and deed - and to take the consequeces, means less fake, more genuine.
free--
I see what you're saying better now. I agree that men calling other men on sexist stuff is difficult, problematic, and a pretty good sign of how much you're willing to back up your theory with your practice.
free beat me to it.
But also: there's a *way* in which one can make a big deal of...
well, actually, point of fact, I'm not sure that "making a big deal" of it verbally is ever something I don't at least quirk an eyebrow at.
sort of reminds me of I don't know, Daffyd on Little Britain, The Only Gay In The Village (tm)
"...and I'm going to go where I can live my gay life, go to gay bars and eat gay crisps..."
anyway.
There are ways and ways in which to talk about one's feminism (and that goes for women and other genders as well). It is, for instance, very possible to say all manner of feminist/woman-helpful things without ever mentioning the f-word at all.
It is also possible to wield the "feminist" label as some sort of crucifix at one's enemies, an all-purpose cover for all sorts of appallingly controlling (and often downright sexist, to boot) behavior and language. anyway, I am deeply suspicious of what I've come to term "born-again" feminism, particularly in men, and most particularly when it's of the "radical" variety.
more suspicious when such men seem to be taking up lots of space and respect in "feminist" spaces. i think, okay, apparently some "radical" people never got as far as the chapter on "appropriation" and "womens' spaces," among other things.
anyway, as I'm sure you know, one of the key criticisms of "male privilege" has been that in this culture, it includes the tacit or not-so-tacit permission to take up lots of space.
so in this instance, it is possible--I make no prescriptions here--but it is just possible that quiet, behind-the-scenes work would be the most appreciated by the womenfolk, who by and large are the ones who are usually relegated to that role.
mileage may vary, of course.
belledame222--
Good points all around.
In fact, talking the feminist talk around men who don't (yet) get feminism might well be facillitated by *not* using the f-word. On the other hand, as a man who's a feminist, I always also have to make sure I'm not avoiding using that word because I'm afraid of losing priveledge or some such.
I agree with you, also, on the behind-the-scenes stuff. In fact, I tend to be a b-t-s sort of person anyway, but it's still a difficult lesson to learn. When one is passionate about something, one wants to *do something* about it--and men have traditionally been taught that behind the scenes stuff isn't as important (lame), so we may tend to want to do other jobs than that sort on the face of it.
One of the reasons for this very blog is to put out ideas that I think are worthwhile while at the same time not taking up space on the various feminist blogs to do so. Of course, merely existing and being a place for anybody to comment, even this blog takes up space in some larger sense, I suppose; in that case I'd have to argue that, for me, it's important enough to take up that little bit of space. But I'm willing to listen to arguments against, especially from other feminists.
Personally I have no problem with this blog; there's plenty of room on the Internets for all.
I don't even have a problem with men per se speaking up on feminist boards.
I do have a problem when a man stakes out a position for himself as some sort of arbiter of feminism. actually I don't love it when women do it either, but there's an extra layer of "excuse me?" when the menfolk play "more feminist than thou," for me anyway.
Post a Comment